Question of the Week
03 02 09 - 13:26i read through the manifesto and i have a few questions.
1. if morals are based on do what you will, then wont people live in fear? with no absolutes isnt it possible for more people to
do bad things and get away with them?
A) People do all types of bad and immoral things as it is and still get away with it. As I have stated before, anarchy does not
mean chaos. Nothing in this life is absolute except change.
2. how would a government completely on an individual basis work? how could negotiations be made? could society still flourish?
A) Communitys would be set up by like minded individuals, each with their own set of guidelines and repercussions for
infringement on anothers liberties, all of which is determined by the community as a whole. Negotiations would be
done in a similar manner. As far as the community flourishing, the community would be driven by necessity and
survival which is the basis for invention and innovation.
3. has this ever been proven a valid system of government? has anarchy ever shown itself to be reasonable and worth repeating?
A) There have been talks of puting anarchism to the test in a sociological experiment as far as real life, just take a
look at the factory workers in Argentina.
4. couldn't a person just go live off on their own if they wanted to completely be in charge of their own life? why
take down a country, when only a faction wants this?
A) We as a society are moving closer and closer to globalization and when this happens we will all be fucked. Nowhere
to run, nowhere to hide. Small communes will be brought to their knees for breaking away and labeled as insurgents.
For those anarchists living in America, we are living in the belly of the beast. Despotism being the eventual outcome
of the American war machine, sooner or later we will need to throw our bodies on the gears to make it stop.
-Agent of Chaos-
47 comments
